History Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent was the Japanese… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB History SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent was the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in
1931 motivated by The Great Depression of 1929-1939?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Good
Criteria Feedback
Your research question is clear, specific, and historically arguable, which gives the investigation a strong direction.
You keep the line of inquiry focused on causation rather than narration, and you consistently return to whether the Depression was a catalyst or a deeper cause.
Your overall topic selection and framing are appropriate for sustained historical investigation.
Your methodology is relevant, but it is explained more clearly than it is carried out.
You refer to some source types and selection principles that are not always fully visible in the bibliography.
The method would be stronger if you explained more explicitly how you weighed different kinds of evidence against one another.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge and understanding
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
You use a mostly relevant body of evidence, including economic data, official reporting, and historical scholarship.
Your understanding of the topic is clear and coherent, especially in linking Manchurian expansion to the Great Depression, militarism, and international weakness.
You use subject-specific terminology accurately and usually in a way that supports the argument.
Some evidence is broader or more retrospective than the immediate 1931 decision-making you are trying to explain.
A few claims move too quickly from economic hardship to political or military motivation.
Some terminology and causal language could be more carefully qualified so that structural conditions, catalysts, and immediate causes are not blurred together.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.