World Religions Extended Essay Exemplar: How does the inheritance… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Religions SL Extended Essay Example
How does the inheritance system in Adat Perpatih, which prioritises female heirs,
align with or diverge from Islamic inheritance laws, Faraidh, and how is it still relevant
in the modern society?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
You communicate a clear and relevant investigation topic rooted in a specific Malaysian-Muslim context.
You show a generally appropriate mixed-method approach with interviews alongside academic, legal, and religious sources.
You establish the cultural and legal background effectively so the reader understands why the issue matters.
Your research question is still too broad because it combines several substantial lines of inquiry at once.
Your explanation of the topic is sometimes too categorical and needs more precise qualification.
Your methodology would be stronger if you explained participant selection, interview design, and how the evidence was analysed.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Subject knowledge
Good
B.2Use of sources
Good
B.3Subject-specific terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You demonstrate solid understanding of the inheritance framework and the distinction between customary land and individually owned property.
You use a relevant range of subject-specific terms and concepts that are generally connected to the investigation.
You draw on sources that are mostly relevant and apply them directly to the topic.
Some important claims are stated too absolutely and need more careful legal or scholarly support.
Your terminology is not always fully consistent, with occasional spelling or transliteration issues.
At times you rely too heavily on interview claims without clearly separating them from established legal or doctrinal evidence.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research analysis
Moderate
C.2Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
C.3Critical argumentation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure
Good
D.2Layout
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.