French B IA Exemplar: Kiffe Kiffe Demain par Faiza Guene | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB French B HL Internal Assessment Example
Kiffe Kiffe Demain par Faiza Guene.HL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
25/30
General feedback
25/30
0
15
30
No overall summary is available for this report.
5.1·Strength
Page 1• Click to view
The student correctly identifies and cites the source of the extract, demonstrating awareness of proper bibliographic presentation.
Criteria A: Language
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
A.1Vocabulary usage and appropriateness
Good
A.2Grammatical structure variety and complexity
Moderate
A.3Language accuracy and communication effectiveness
Moderate
A.4Pronunciation and intonation
Good
Criteria Feedback
Broad and appropriate lexical range, including idiomatic expressions
Effective use of both simple and complex grammatical structures
Generally accurate language with only occasional minor errors
Clear demonstration of prosodic awareness through idiomatic contractions
A few spelling and agreement lapses (e.g. “Pourguoi”, missing agreements)
Occasional register slips between sociolect and standard French
Minor inconsistencies in complex structure accuracy
1.1·Suggestion
Page 4• Click to view
The term ‘volontourisme’ is introduced, showing lexical range; student should define and critique it with concrete examples.
Criteria B: Message—Literary Extract
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Relevance to literary extract
Excellent
B.2Use of extract and development of observations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Consistently relevant and persuasive engagement with the literary extract
Effective exploitation of quotations to launch well-structured reflections
Well-developed and supported observations linking text themes to contemporary examples
Extract is reproduced in full without accompanying close-reading commentary
Lacks focused analysis on how respect is portrayed and its wider implications
Could enrich interpretation by contextualizing edition or translation choices
2.1·Suggestion
Page 1• Click to view
While the publication details (Livre de Poche) are included, the student should contextualize the edition’s significance or translation choices to enrich analysis.
2.2·Weakness
Page 1• Click to view
The extract is reproduced in full but lacks any accompanying analysis or interpretation. Add focused commentary on how respect is portrayed and its social implications.
Criteria C: Message—Conversation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
C.1Response relevance and appropriateness
Excellent
C.2Response development and depth
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Questions and prompts are consistently tailored to extract themes, showing clear relevance
Planned responses indicate breadth of scope and personal stance with evaluation
Use of examples and occasional humor suggests depth of engagement
No actual student responses provided to demonstrate real-time relevance or depth
Multiple sections lack personal examples or structured commentary
Absence of modeled answers prevents full assessment of conversational fluency
3.1·Weakness
Page 1• Click to view
The section header signals the start of conversation questions, but no student responses are provided. Include sample answers to demonstrate engagement.
3.2·Weakness
Page 1• Click to view
The ‘Relations sociales’ theme is well organized but lacks student-generated ideas or personal examples that would deepen the conversation.
3.3·Weakness
Page 2• Click to view
The final question on parental education differences is promising for personal insight but lacks any student reflection or examples.
3.4·Suggestion
Page 2• Click to view
The question about compulsory schooling invites policy reflection; the student should offer stance and justify with country-specific data.
3.5·Weakness
Page 2• Click to view
The ‘Éducation’ section is clearly signposted but contains no student observations. Provide structured commentary to show critical engagement with schooling themes.
3.6·Suggestion
Page 2• Click to view
The question ‘Les amis sont-ils plus importants que la famille?’ is thought-provoking; the student should model a balanced answer with examples.
3.7·Weakness
Page 2• Click to view
The first friendship question introduces a core conversational theme, but without any student response its relevance cannot be assessed or developed.
3.8·Weakness
Page 3• Click to view
Though the ‘Activités de loisirs’ header organizes the theme well, student elaboration on personal hobbies is missing.
3.9·Weakness
Page 3• Click to view
The ethical question on child labor invites nuanced argumentation; the student has not provided any justification or stance.
3.10·Weakness
Page 3• Click to view
The initial tweet of questions on page 3 shows range, yet the absence of student stance prevents assessment of relevance or depth.
3.11·Suggestion
Page 3• Click to view
The question on preparing for future work is forward-looking; include a response detailing skills or experiences to demonstrate depth.
3.12·Suggestion
Page 3• Click to view
The prompt ‘Quel est ton cours préféré…’ is effective for eliciting personal detail; the student should include a clear, analytical response.
3.13·Weakness
Page 4• Click to view
The sports values question is well formulated; student should articulate specific attributes and link to personal or cultural examples.
3.14·Suggestion
Page 4• Click to view
The question on the relevance and politicization of the Olympics contextually supports contemporary debate; include critical response and examples.
3.15·Weakness
Page 4• Click to view
The ‘Vacances et voyages’ section is clearly marked but lacks travel reflections or anecdotes; student should include personal narratives.
3.16·Weakness
Page 4• Click to view
The environmental impact question on tourism is timely but lacks any student argument or data to substantiate a position.
3.17·Suggestion
Page 5• Click to view
The cultural question on must-visit sites invites descriptive and evaluative language; the student should include personal recommendations and rationale.
3.18·Weakness
Page 5• Click to view
The opening question on historical sites raises a critical issue; student should analyze case studies or local examples to develop depth.
3.19·Weakness
Page 5• Click to view
The carbon-footprint question is highly relevant but would benefit from the student outlining concrete personal actions or policy proposals.
3.20·Suggestion
Page 5• Click to view
The question on doping in high-level sports opens an ethical debate; the student should present a reasoned stance supported by research.
Criteria D: Interactive Skills—Communication
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
D.1Comprehension and interaction quality
Excellent
D.2Response provision and participation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Logical sequencing of follow-up questions implies sustained comprehension
Evidence of readiness for independent contributions and rhetorical engagement
Prompts show capability to maintain conversational thread without repetition
Limited concrete evidence of real-time comprehension or spontaneous repair
Some suggested intercultural and personal reflections are missing
Not fully effortless; small lapses expected
4.1·Weakness
Page 5• Click to view
The query on inappropriate tourist behavior could illustrate intercultural awareness; include examples and personal reflections to strengthen participation.