La ambigüedad utilizada en “La Biblioteca de Babel” y “Las Ruinas Circulares” de Jorge Luis Borges para la construcción de una perspectiva incierta sobre la realidadSL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Knowledge, Understanding and Interpretation
5/5
0
3
5
Criteria Strands
A.1Knowledge and understanding of the work/text
Excellent
A.2Use of references and textual support
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- You show solid knowledge of both Borges texts and keep the comparison focused on shared concerns such as reality, knowledge, and perception.
- You select relevant quotations that usually support your claims well, especially when discussing the library, the temple, and the dream structure.
- You establish a clear conceptual frame that helps the essay stay anchored in Borges’s wider intellectual concerns.
- Some broader claims, such as links to modern physics or linguistic relativity, need closer textual proof to feel fully convincing.
- A few claims are more general than precise, so the comparison sometimes stays at the level of shared themes rather than specific differences.
- Some references could be used more closely and consistently to strengthen the link between evidence and interpretation.
Criteria B: Analysis and Evaluation
5/5
0
3
5
Criteria Strands
B.1Analysis of textual features and author's choices
Good
Criteria Feedback
- You identify several meaningful textual features, including enumeration, personification, declarative syntax, and the circular structure.
- You usually connect those features to the effects of uncertainty and instability in a relevant way.
- Your comments often show awareness that Borges is shaping the reader’s perception, not just telling a story.
- Some analysis stays close to description before moving into broader claims about meaning.
- A few important terms, such as narrative perspective and omniscience, need more precise support from the wording of the text.
- The discussion would be stronger if you explained more explicitly how specific features change the reader’s understanding of the ending or the structure as a whole.
Criteria C: Focus, Organization and Development
5/5
0
3
5
Criteria Strands
C.1Organization and development of ideas
Excellent
C.2Integration of supporting examples
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Language
5/5
0
3
5
Criteria Strands
D.1Language clarity and accuracy
Good
D.2Register and style appropriateness
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.